John B. Watson

Although John Broadus Watson made several contributions to the field of psychology, most notably his work with Rosalie Rayner on conditioned emotional responses and his later work in advertising, his most enduring contribution is considered to be his role as the founder of behaviorism.

How did J. B. Watson contribute to behaviorism?

John B. Watson is widely recognized as the founder of behaviorism, a school of thought that revolutionized the field of psychology in the early 20th century.

J.B. Watson’s contribution to behaviorism was multifaceted. He provided a new definition of psychology, a rigorous scientific methodology, and a focus on the role of learning and environment that transformed the field.

While some of his views were considered extreme and have been re-evaluated over time, his vision of a science of behavior with practical applications continues to be pursued in various forms today.

1. Formalization of Behaviorism as a School of Thought: Watson’s 1913 article, “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It,” often called the “behaviorist manifesto,” is considered the foundational document of behaviorism. In it, he explicitly challenged the then-dominant introspective psychology and argued for a psychology based solely on observable behavior, rejecting internal mental states as a valid subject of study.
2. Emphasis on Objectivity and Scientific Methodology: Watson insisted that psychology adopts the rigorous scientific methods of natural sciences. This meant relying on objective observation and measurement of behavior rather than subjective introspection, which he considered unreliable and unscientific. His emphasis on objective observation and measurement helped to establish psychology as a scientific discipline.
3. The Primacy of Learning and Environmental Influence: Watson argued that behavior is primarily shaped by experience and the environment, rather than innate factors like instincts. This emphasis on nurture over nature led him to believe that behavior could be modified through conditioning, paving the way for the development of behavioral therapies.
4. Focus on Prediction and Control of Behavior: A core tenet of Watson’s behaviorism was the idea that psychology should strive to predict and control behavior. He believed that a true understanding of behavior required the ability to not only observe and describe it, but also to manipulate the environmental variables that influence it.
5. Pioneering Research in Classical Conditioning: Inspired by the work of Ivan Pavlov, Watson conducted groundbreaking research on classical conditioning, demonstrating its applicability to human emotions through the famous “Little Albert” experiment. This experiment provided strong evidence for the idea that emotional responses could be learned and unlearned through environmental manipulation.
6. Practical Applications: Watson envisioned a psychology with practical applications, believing that behavioral principles could be used to solve real-world problems in areas like education, child-rearing, and advertising. This emphasis on the practical application of psychological knowledge contrasted with the more theoretical and research-oriented focus of many introspective psychologists.
7. Lasting Legacy and Influence: Although behaviorism as Watson envisioned it is no longer the dominant paradigm in psychology, it had a profound impact on the field, shifting the focus of psychology from the study of consciousness to the study of behavior and laying the groundwork for the development of new learning theories and therapies.

Even amidst considerable controversy surrounding his personal life and his often extreme views on environmentalism, Watson’s contributions to psychology remain significant, and he is still considered one of the most important figures in the history of psychology.

Little Albert Experiment

Watson’s (1920) most famous experiment, conducted with Rosalie Rayner, involved conditioning a fear response in a young child known as “Little Albert“. The experiment demonstrated that emotional responses, specifically fear, could be learned through classical conditioning.

• Procedure: Initially, Little Albert showed no fear towards a white rat. However, Watson and Rayner paired the presentation of the rat with a loud, startling noise (an unconditioned stimulus that naturally elicited a fear response). After repeated pairings, Little Albert began to exhibit a fear response (crying and attempting to move away) at the sight of the rat alone, even without the noise. This indicated that the fear response had become conditioned to the rat.
• Stimulus Generalization: The experiment also revealed that Little Albert’s conditioned fear generalized to other furry objects, such as a rabbit, a dog, a fur coat, and even a Santa Claus mask, demonstrating that learned responses could extend beyond the specific stimuli used in conditioning.
• Ethical Concerns: The Little Albert experiment has been widely criticized for its ethical implications. The study involved inducing a fear response in a young child, and there was no evidence of any attempt to extinguish the conditioned fear, potentially leaving Little Albert with lasting psychological effects. Modern ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects would prohibit such an experiment.
• Historical Significance: The experiment significantly impacted psychology by providing empirical support for Watson’s behaviorist theory and demonstrating the power of classical conditioning in shaping human emotions. The experiment also highlighted the potential for applying behavioral principles to understand and treat psychological conditions, particularly phobias, which Watson believed were learned responses that could be unlearned through similar conditioning techniques.

Personal Life

While Watson’s legacy is primarily defined by his groundbreaking work in behaviorism, his personal life reveals a more complex and contradictory figure.

John B. Watson’s personal life was marked by both professional success and personal turmoil. While he achieved significant recognition for his work in psychology, particularly for pioneering behaviorism, his personal life, especially his divorce and subsequent career shift, continues to be a subject of debate among scholars.

• Early Life and Upbringing: Born in 1878 in rural South Carolina, Watson came from a humble background marked by financial struggles and the absence of his father. His mother, a devout Baptist, played a significant role in his upbringing, moving the family to provide better opportunities for her children. This religious upbringing likely influenced his later rejection of subjective psychology and his pursuit of a purely objective, scientific approach to the study of behavior.
• Marriages and Relationships: Watson was married twice. His first marriage to Mary Ickes, a former student, was reportedly strained from the beginning and further complicated by conflicts with his brother-in-law, Harold Ickes, a powerful figure who later served as Secretary of the Interior under President Roosevelt.
• The Johns Hopkins Scandal: In 1920, Watson’s burgeoning career at Johns Hopkins University was abruptly cut short due to a highly publicized divorce scandal involving his relationship with a graduate student, Rosalie Rayner. This scandal, considered shocking at the time, ostracized Watson from academia and forced him to rebuild his career outside of traditional academic settings.
• Rosalie Rayner and Family Life: Following his divorce, Watson married Rosalie Rayner, and they collaborated on various projects, including their influential book on child-rearing, “Psychological Care of Infant and Child”. While Watson’s views on child-rearing, advocating for emotional control and limited physical affection, have been criticized as cold and detached, his son James later described him as a warm and charming father in a personal account. Rosalie’s untimely death in 1936 deeply affected Watson, leading to a period of depression and withdrawal.
• Personality and Public Persona: Watson was known for his charisma and commanding presence, described as “attractive, strong, scientifically accomplished, and forceful” during a time when other psychologists seemed less assertive. His critics often pointed to his ambition, strong ego, and tendency toward extreme statements to further his ideas. Some argue that this need for attention and financial gain contributed to his later embrace of extreme environmentalism and his sometimes provocative public pronouncements.
• Later Years and Reflections: After leaving academia, Watson found success and financial security in the advertising industry, where he applied his behavioral principles to marketing, consumer behavior, and personnel management. Despite this successful second career, Watson seemed to regret his expulsion from academia and continued to engage with psychological topics, writing, and lecturing until his retirement in 1945.

Watson’s Perspective on Child-Rearing

While John B. Watson is primarily known for pioneering behaviorism, his views on child-rearing also garnered significant attention, sparking both interest and controversy.

Watson emphasizes environmental influence, conditioned learning, and the application of behavioral principles to shaping a child’s development.

While his emphasis on environmental influence and conditioned learning offered a new perspective on child development, his advocacy for strict emotional control and limited affection has drawn significant criticism.

Understanding the historical context and the evolution of Watson’s own thinking is crucial for a nuanced perspective on this complex and often controversial aspect of his legacy.

Key Ideas:

• Extreme Environmentalism: Watson firmly believed that environmental factors, particularly a child’s upbringing and experiences, played the dominant role in shaping their behavior and personality. He minimized the influence of heredity, asserting that learned habits and conditioned responses ultimately determined an individual’s developmental outcome. This stance, often labeled as extreme environmentalism, was a cornerstone of his approach to child-rearing, leading him to make provocative statements about his ability to mold a child’s future regardless of their inherited traits.
• Conditioned Learning and Emotional Control: Drawing on the principles of classical conditioning, Watson believed that emotional responses, like fear, love, and anger, were not innate but rather learned through association. This belief was famously illustrated in the “Little Albert” experiment, where Watson and Rosalie Rayner demonstrated that a fear response could be conditioned in a young child. This emphasis on conditioned learning extended to his views on child-rearing, leading him to advocate for strict emotional control and a regimented approach to shaping a child’s behavior.
• The Psychological Care of Infant and Child: Watson’s views on child-rearing were most explicitly outlined in his 1928 book, co-authored with Rosalie Rayner, “Psychological Care of Infant and Child”. This book, informed by his behaviorist principles, offered practical advice to parents on raising children, often advocating for a strict, scheduled routine, limited physical affection, and an emphasis on independence and self-reliance. This approach, while considered groundbreaking at the time, has since been widely criticized as cold, detached, and potentially detrimental to a child’s emotional development.

Points of Contention and Later Reflections:

• Criticism and Controversy: Watson’s views on child-rearing, particularly his emphasis on emotional control and limited physical affection, were met with considerable criticism, both during his time and in subsequent decades. Critics argued that his approach was overly rigid, lacked warmth, and failed to acknowledge the importance of emotional bonding in a child’s development.
• Watson’s Later Regrets: Interestingly, Watson himself later expressed regret over some of the advice offered in “Psychological Care of Infant and Child,” acknowledging that his understanding of child development had evolved since its publication. This suggests a potential softening of his earlier rigid stance and a recognition of the complexities involved in raising children.
• A Product of His Time: It’s important to note that Watson’s views on child-rearing were heavily influenced by the social and cultural context of his era. The early 20th century was a time of significant social change, marked by industrialization, urbanization, and a growing emphasis on scientific progress. Watson’s behaviorism, with its focus on objectivity, control, and the prediction of behavior, resonated with the zeitgeist of his time, shaping his approach to child-rearing and contributing to its popularity despite its controversial aspects.

Life After Academia: J.B. Watson’s Second Career

After a very public divorce scandal in 1920, John B. Watson was forced to resign from his position at Johns Hopkins University at the peak of his academic career.

Unable to secure another academic appointment, Watson transitioned into the world of advertising, where he applied his behavioral principles with great success.

• Entry into Advertising: Through connections with sociologist William I. Thomas, Watson secured a position at the J. Walter Thompson advertising agency. His understanding of human behavior and his emphasis on the prediction and control of behavior proved to be valuable assets in the field of advertising.
• Early Success and Lasting Influence: Watson quickly rose through the ranks, becoming a vice president at J. Walter Thompson in 1924. He remained in the advertising industry until his retirement in 1945, holding a subsequent vice president position at the William Esty agency. Watson applied his behavioral principles to various aspects of advertising, including:
  • Brand Appeal: Conducting research on consumer preferences and brand appeal, exemplified by his work with cigarettes.
  • Consumer Choice Testing: Developing marketing tools like the “brand X” consumer choice test.
  • Product Marketing: Creating behavioral sales platforms, exemplified by his work with Johnson & Johnson baby powder and cosmetics.
  • Pioneering Radio Advertising: Recognizing and utilizing the emerging medium of radio for effective advertising campaigns.
• Continued Interest in Psychology: Despite his departure from academia, Watson continued to write, lecture, and engage with psychological topics. He taught at the New School for Social Research and conducted infant behavior experiments at Columbia University during the 1920s. He also continued to refine his behaviorist theories and popularize them through books, articles, and radio broadcasts.

Legacy in Advertising: A Lasting Impact

Watson’s work in advertising went beyond simply applying his theories to marketing campaigns; he also made significant contributions to personnel selection and management within the industry.

• Selection and Management: Watson’s focus on observable behavior and his belief in the power of environmental influence led him to advocate for personality testing in personnel selection, a practice that continues to be widespread in various forms today.
• Enduring Influence: Although his time in advertising marked a departure from traditional academic psychology, it allowed Watson to demonstrate the practical applications of his behaviorist principles on a large scale. His work in advertising contributed to the development of market research and consumer behavior analysis, shaping the relationship between psychology and business in the decades that followed.

While some psychologists at the time criticized Watson’s decision to enter the advertising world, viewing it as a departure from pure scientific pursuit, his success in the field and his continued engagement with psychological topics demonstrate his commitment to the practical applications of behavioral principles.

Critical Evaluation

What aspects of Watson’s behaviorism were influenced by his contemporaries and predecessors?

John B. Watson’s development of behaviorism was significantly shaped by the ideas and research of his contemporaries and predecessors. While he is recognized for popularizing behaviorism, his work was deeply rooted in earlier scientific and philosophical currents.

• Rejection of Introspection and Emphasis on Objectivity:
  • Watson’s behaviorism emerged as a direct response to the dominant schools of psychology at the time, particularly structuralism and functionalism, both of which relied heavily on introspection – the subjective observation of one’s own mental states.
  • He viewed introspection as inherently unreliable and unscientific, advocating for a more objective approach focused solely on observable behavior.
  • This emphasis on objectivity aligned with the broader scientific trends of the early 20th century, which favored empirical observation and measurement over subjective interpretation.
• Influence of Comparative Psychology and Animal Research:
  • Watson’s interest in studying behavior, rather than consciousness, was cultivated during his time at the University of Chicago, where he was drawn to comparative psychology – the study of animal behavior.
  • Working with animals, particularly rats, allowed Watson to focus on observable actions and develop experimental methods that minimized subjective interpretation.
  • This experience likely solidified his belief in the applicability of animal research findings to human behavior, a stance that was further supported by Darwin’s theory of evolution, which posited a continuity between species.
• Building on the Legacy of Classical Conditioning:
  • Watson’s most significant contribution to behaviorism was his application of classical conditioning principles, initially discovered by Ivan Pavlov, to human emotions and behavior.
  • While Pavlov focused primarily on physiological responses, Watson saw the potential of conditioning to explain a wide range of human actions, from simple reflexes to complex emotions.
  • His famous “Little Albert” experiment, while ethically controversial today, demonstrated the power of classical conditioning to shape fear responses in humans, further solidifying Watson’s conviction in the power of environmental influences.
• Engagement with Psychoanalysis, Despite Later Rejection:
  • A perhaps surprising influence on Watson’s early work was psychoanalysis, particularly the work of Sigmund Freud.
  • Watson initially saw potential in psychoanalysis, appreciating its emphasis on early childhood experiences as shaping adult behavior, a concept he later integrated into his own theories.
  • However, he ultimately rejected psychoanalysis for its reliance on the unconscious mind, which he considered unscientific and immeasurable.
  • Despite this rejection, some scholars argue that Watson’s focus on the influence of early experiences on personality development stemmed, at least in part, from his engagement with psychoanalytic ideas.
• The Role of Functionalism and Habit Formation:
  • Although Watson ultimately rejected functionalism, he was initially influenced by its emphasis on studying the purpose and function of behavior. This is evident in his early focus on habit formation as a key mechanism of behavioral development.
  • He viewed habits as learned associations between stimuli and responses, shaped by the principles of contiguity, frequency, and recency – concepts rooted in functionalist thought.
  • While Watson later shifted his emphasis from habit formation to classical conditioning, his early work reflects the influence of functionalist principles in understanding learned behavior.

In addition to these specific influences, it’s important to note the broader intellectual and social context in which Watson’s behaviorism developed. The early 20th century was a time of significant scientific advancement, with a growing emphasis on objectivity, measurement, and the search for universal laws governing natural phenomena. Watson’s behaviorism, with its focus on observable behavior and its ambition to predict and control human actions, aligned with this broader scientific zeitgeist, contributing to its appeal and influence.

However, Watson was not merely a passive recipient of these influences. He actively engaged with the work of his predecessors and contemporaries, adapting, refining, and at times, vehemently rejecting their ideas to forge his own distinct brand of behaviorism. He combined elements of comparative psychology, classical conditioning, and even aspects of psychoanalysis, while rejecting introspection and any notion of an immeasurable mind. His work, both groundbreaking and controversial, sparked a paradigm shift in psychology, establishing behaviorism as a dominant force in the field for decades to come.

What were J. B. Watson’s beliefs about nature versus nurture?

John B. Watson is known for his extreme environmentalist stance on the nature-nurture debate. This means he firmly believed that environmental factors play a far more significant role in shaping an individual’s behavior and personality than inherited traits.

While acknowledging the existence of inherited physical structures and a few basic instincts, Watson posits that experience and learning are the primary drivers of human development.

Several key points highlight his stance:

• Minimizing Inherited Traits: Watson distinguished between the inheritance of physical structures and the inheritance of functions, arguing that while the former is undoubtedly heritable, the latter is not. He believed functions arise from how the environment shapes inherited structures, a process that begins even before birth. He rejected attributing behavioral differences to race or other hereditary variables, attributing them solely to environmental experiences.
• “Give Me a Dozen Healthy Infants”: Watson’s (1924) famous assertion, ‘Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select… ‘ (p. 10) epitomizes his extreme environmentalist view. This statement reflects his belief in the infinite plasticity of human nature and the power of environmental control to shape individuals into virtually anything, regardless of their inherited predispositions.
• Emphasis on Learning and Conditioning: Watson viewed learning and conditioning as the primary mechanisms through which the environment shapes behavior. He championed classical conditioning, inspired by Pavlov’s work, as a powerful tool for understanding how environmental stimuli become associated with specific responses, even emotional responses like fear, as demonstrated in his Little Albert experiment.
• Rejection of Instinct: Initially, Watson did recognize the role of instincts in behavior. However, he later completely dismissed the concept, asserting that what was previously labeled as instinct was merely a product of learning and environmental shaping. This shift towards a more absolute environmentalist position further solidifies his belief in the dominance of nurture over nature.
• Social Implications of Environmentalism: Watson’s environmentalist stance held significant social implications, particularly in challenging the eugenics movement prevalent during his time. While eugenics emphasized heredity as the primary determinant of traits, including intelligence and criminal behavior, Watson argued against such genetic determinism, emphasizing the power of environmental interventions to shape individuals and address social problems.

However, it is important to note:

• Extreme Environmentalism Critiqued: Even strong proponents of environmental influence, such as B.F. Skinner, considered Watson’s environmentalism extreme and potentially detrimental to the field of psychology. They acknowledged the importance of considering both environmental and hereditary factors in shaping behavior.
• Simplification of Watson’s Views: Later interpretations of Watson’s work often presented an overly simplistic view of his ideas, portraying him as believing that all behavior is learned. While he strongly emphasized learning and environmental influence, it’s important to remember that his views were more nuanced and evolved throughout his career.

What were Watson’s main criticisms of psychoanalysis?

John B. Watson, despite his own forays into the study of psychoanalysis and the use of psychoanalytic methods, developed several criticisms of psychoanalysis, mainly focusing on what he perceived as its lack of scientific rigor and its reliance on unverifiable concepts.

• Mentalism and the Unconscious: Watson strongly objected to the psychoanalytic concept of the unconscious, viewing it as a vague and untestable entity that could not be studied scientifically. He argued that psychology should focus on observable behavior and that invoking an “unconscious mind” to explain behavior was unnecessary and unscientific.

Surely we gain nothing by this concept. We can study the visible and tangible effect of suppressions, tangles, conflicting habits and the like without positing a ‘subconscious’.

• Subjective Methods: Watson criticized the subjective methods used in psychoanalysis, particularly introspection and dream analysis, for lacking objectivity and reliability. He argued that these methods were prone to bias and that they could not be independently verified. He believed that only objective methods, such as those used in the laboratory to study behavior, could provide a valid basis for understanding human psychology.
• Lack of Experimental Validation: While impressed with some of the phenomena described by Freud and his followers, Watson argued that psychoanalytic concepts needed to be experimentally tested and validated before they could be accepted as scientific knowledge. He believed that psychoanalysis had not produced sufficient empirical evidence to support its claims and that its theories were often speculative and untestable. He called for a more scientific approach to the study of psychology, one that relied on objective observation and experimentation rather than on clinical interpretation.
• Focus on Sex: Watson found Freud’s emphasis on sexuality, particularly infantile sexuality, to be excessive and unnecessary. While acknowledging the existence of sexual instincts, he believed that psychoanalysis overstated their role in shaping personality and neurosis. In contrast to Freud’s focus on sexual conflicts stemming from childhood, Watson emphasized the role of learning and conditioning in shaping emotional responses, including fear and anxiety.
• Limited Applicability: Watson, in line with his pragmatic approach to psychology, criticized psychoanalysis for its limited practical applicability. He envisioned a psychology that could be used to solve real-world problems, and he believed that psychoanalysis, with its focus on internal mental states and past experiences, had little to offer in this regard. He argued for a psychology that could be applied to areas such as education, business, and mental health, and he saw behaviorism as providing the tools for such an applied science.

Despite these criticisms, Watson acknowledged that psychoanalysis had made some valuable contributions, such as highlighting the importance of early childhood experiences and recognizing the influence of unconscious processes on behavior.

However, he maintained that these insights needed to be reinterpreted within a behavioristic framework that emphasized observable behavior and the role of learning and conditioning.

Sources

Bergmann, G. (1956). The contribution of John B. Watson. Psychological Review, 63, 265–276.

Freud, S. (1923/1927). The ego and the id. In Standard Edition (19) (pp. 88). London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Freud, S. (1915/1970). The unconscious. In W. Russell (Ed.), Milestones in motivation. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

Pavlov, I. P. (1897/1902). The work of the digestive glands. London: Griffin.

Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–2277.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

Skinner, B. F. (1980). Notebooks (Ed. R. Epstein). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Watson, J. B. (1907). Review of Joseph Jastrow, The Subconscious. American Journal of Sociology, 12, 558–561.

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

Watson, J. B. (1914). Behavior: An introduction to comparative psychology. New York: Holt.

Watson, J. B. (1916). The psychology of wish fulfillment. Scientific Monthly, 3, 479–487.

Watson, J B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Watson, J. B. (1920). Is thinking merely the action of language mechanisms? British Journal of Psychology, 11, 87–104.

Watson, J B., & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5,1-14

Watson, J. B. (1922).“The analysis of mind,” Dial, 72, 97–102.

Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York: People’s Institute.

Watson, J. B. (1928). Psychological care of infant and child. WW Norton.

Watson, J. B. (1926). What is behaviorism? Harper’s Monthly Magazine, 152, 723–729

Watson, J B. (1970). Behaviorism (Rev. ed.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1924)

Woodworth, R. S. (1924). Four varieties of behaviorism. Psychological Review, 31, 257–264.